Edward H. Smith
PMB 296 at 816 Elm St.
Manchester, NH 03101

Background Information
Bus:(603) 867-1022
Fax:(603) 218-6624 edsmith@ehsportal.com
 

Today is Thursday, September 9th, 2010
National Debt Clock
More
About EHSPortal.com


 
News & Education
  EHS Daily Journal
RBT Commentary

Consulting Services
  Terms & Conditions
The EHS Letter Manual

The CMR System
  General Information
Why CMR?
Order Form

Business Referrals
  Recommended Contacts



 

EHS Daily Journal #58 - August 24, 2009

Toxic Assets

 
Money Facts Archive
Get the real facts that will shape your future by having them delivered to your Inbox!


Although you won't find the term in your dictionary, toxic assets are assets that have decreased so much in value that no one will buy them. The term became popular, perhaps, after Countrywide Financial's founder, Angelo Mozilo, used the term to describe some of Countrywide's mortgage products.

During the subprime mortgage crisis, many mortgages were rendered "toxic" (i.e. worth less than their face value for a host of reasons) and the banks were, for all practical purposes, now "stuck with them."

Although the government has intervened to purchase back a significant portion of these toxic assets, many banks and other major financial-institutions are still unwilling to sell their existing toxic assets at a significant loss, since that would force the banks to admit their stated assets are now significantly reduced; making them appear insolvent.

So the result is a "stand-off" of sorts: The banks want all the cash they can extract, but they are reluctant to take the losses that are inherent to a vast majority of the short-sale proposals or deed in lieu offers - and the properties just keep going to foreclosure.

But way too many foreclosures are not "public auctions" at all. They are really just an exercise where the bank (or Freddie Mac - or Fannie Mae) buys the property to "foreclose" (i.e. sweep under the rug) the corresponding toxic asset that isn't saleable. The rationale, perhaps, is that the bank now owns something (the actual property) that they think can be sold for more than the mortgage they foreclosed.

However, in a March 18, 2009 article entitled "Fannie, Freddie REO inventory swells - Eight homes foreclosed for every short sale," Inman News reported that:

"Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac boosted loan modifications by 76 percent in the last three months of 2008, but nearly doubled their inventories of real estate-owned properties over the course of the year as the companies eschewed short sales and seized properties faster than they could sell them....Fannie and Freddie's regulator, the Federal Housing Finance Agency, submitted a report to lawmakers today detailing actions taken to prevent unnecessary foreclosures."

Maybe this is the real problem (first sentence at the new FHFA website):

"Welcome to the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA). This Web site premiered October 27, 2008, as the portal to information about this new agency, which was formed by a legislative merger of the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO), the Federal Housing Finance Board (FHFB) and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) government-sponsored enterprise (GSE) mission team. FHFA regulates Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the 12 Federal Home Loan Banks."

I've got new for you. It's going to take more than a glorified "legislative merger" to solve this problem.

- Ed Smith